Of Huckleberry Finn and Heavenly Rest

You might recall that despite her best efforts, the Widow Douglas’ sister, Miss Watson, was unable to interest Huckleberry Finn in heaven. In fact, you might say that because of her best efforts she inoculated Huck against any interest in heaven. To Miss Watson, and surely the Widow Douglas, too—who doubtless were old enough to have experienced their share of the troubles and turmoil of life—their image of heaven seemed very attractive. “She said all a body would have to do there was to go around all day long with a harp and sing, forever and ever.” Huckleberry Finn’s judgment on this depiction of heaven was, “So I didn’t think much of it. . . . I asked her if she reckoned Tom Sawyer would go there, and she said not by a considerable sight. I was glad about that, because I wanted him and me to be together.” (Mark Twain, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, chapter 1)

For Miss Watson, heaven was a haven of rest, while for Huck it offered far too much rest. Both were right and wrong together. For the real heaven offers “every good thing” (Moroni 7:20), full of rest and activity, and you do not have to die first to find them.

The Apostle Paul, writing to the Philippians, spoke of “the peace of God, which passeth all understanding” as a promise to be awarded in this life (Philippians 4:7). Shipwrecked, beaten, persecuted, and jailed, ever traveling about in his missionary service, where was the peace, where was the rest in Paul’s life?

The prophets have ever promised rest and peace to the faithful disciples of Jesus Christ. What are those gifts, though, and when are they given? Rest assured that the peace and rest of Christ do not approach what Huckleberry feared and reach far beyond what Miss Watson could imagine.

The peace and rest of heaven are not some kind of holy lethargy. The modern prophet, Brigham Young, said this about our eternal existence, what he considered life in its fullest meaning:

Life is an accumulation of every property and principle that is calculated to enrich, to ennoble, to enlarge, and to increase, in every particular, the dominion of individual man. . . . It is to pursue that course wherein we shall never, never lose what we shall obtain, but continue to collect, to gather together, to increase, to spread abroad, and extend to an endless duration. Those persons who strive to gain eternal life, gain that which will produce the increase their hearts will be satisfied with. Nothing less than the privilege of increasing eternally, in every sense of the word, can satisfy the immortal spirit. (Journal of Discourses, Vol. 1, p.349. 350)

There is no peace and rest in that if you mean a peace and rest that are akin to sleep. But if you are looking for a peace and rest that are full of life and that fill and satisfy the soul, then you are looking for the peace and rest promised by the prophets of Christ in all ages.

This enduring peace and genuine rest come from living a life of integrity, in which all of the parts of one’s life are working together, where there is no war going on in the mind and spirit. The man whose life is an unending series of moral dilemmas, or whose daily walk seems continually out of step, who frequently is torn between one path or another, knows agony and frustration and is familiar with nagging anxiety, living his own personal and daily portion of hell. The ancient Christian disciple, James, declared, “A double minded man is unstable in all his ways.” (James 1:8) Coming to Christ puts all of that internal warfare to rest. Jesus taught in the Sermon on the Mount, “if therefore thine eye be single to the glory of God, thy whole body shall be full of light.” (Matthew 6:22 [JST]) Then the Savior warned, “No man can serve two masters” (Matthew 6:24).

We have to make our decision, to follow Christ or not. Until we do—with full purpose of heart— we will know no meaningful peace and find no lasting rest. Indeed, a man will remain an enemy to God until he turns his heart singly to the Lord, “and becometh a saint through the atonement of Christ the Lord, and becometh as a child, submissive, meek, humble, patient, full of love” (Mosiah 3:19).

When we do that and only when we do that do we begin to live, to be fully alive, to enjoy all that life has for us. As Christ declared, “I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.” (John 10:10) Those who have obtained that abundant life were referred to by the ancient American prophet, Mormon, as “the peaceable followers of Christ . . . that have obtained a sufficient hope by which they can enter into the rest of the Lord, from this time henceforth until ye shall rest with him in heaven.” (Moroni 7:3) That is a promise to surpass the joys of any Miss Watson and satisfy the aspirations of the Huck Finn in us all.

Of the Power of Change and the Power of Christ

Change is in the air. It is autumn, the leaves have begun their brief flash of color before gliding to the ground to be swept away.

Fall is also the season when politicians promise change. The mood predominating among the electorate this year seems to be disillusionment with Change. They want change from Change—that is, from Change that makes things worse and reinforces what is bad in Washington. At least for now, voters are showing a strong preference for candidates who do not fit the usual political mold, who reject solutions imposed from Washington. Such moments do not come very often, and like the autumn they seem to pass too quickly.

Yet with all of this discussion of the change apparent in nature and the political world, it seems strange to find those who doubt the ability of people to change. Properly understood, the plan of God for His children is all about change.

The central message of Jesus Christ and of all of His prophets has been the need and possibility for people to change, to change their world by changing themselves, from the world of unhappiness and distraction, to a life of purpose, growth, and deep joy. All who have drawn close to the Savior have experienced change, have drawn upon His power to change, and the closer they drew to Him the more that they changed and became more like Him.

Consider the early Apostles who lived while the Savior walked the earth. Mere fishermen (Peter and John) were turned into inspired leaders whose testimonies have endured for two millennia. A tax collector (Matthew) was converted into a human benefactor. A persecuting zealot (Paul) turned into a powerful missionary. In earlier days, a slave (Joseph) became viceroy of Egypt, a fugitive from Pharaoh’s court (Moses) became the mighty lawgiver who led Israel from bondage, a shepherd (David) became King of Israel. The change in these whom history calls great was repeated among millions of their less well-known compatriots.

In our own times, an untaught boy (Joseph Smith) became a wise prophet and religious founder, a craftsman (Brigham Young) became the greatest colonizer of the West. Again, these are more prominent examples among millions of others similarly changed through the power of Christ, the more effectively changed the closer that they approached Him.

When I was in college a friend explained to me her disillusionment with her church, which in her view told its members to be good but somehow lacked the power to transform them. It lacked the power of Christ, who made change of life possible. As the ancient American prophet Mormon explained in a letter to his son, Moroni, through Jesus Christ our sins can be forgiven, our past can be overcome.

And the remission of sins bringeth meekness, and lowliness of heart; and because of meekness and lowliness of heart cometh the visitation of the Holy Ghost, which Comforter filleth with hope and perfect love, which love endureth by diligence unto prayer, until the end shall come, when all the saints shall dwell with God. (Moroni 8:26)

There is power, the greatest power on earth, the power to change the greatest creations on earth, the children of God. There is the power to transform men and women and make them fit to live with the Father in His presence forever, “that ye may at last be brought to sit down with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and the holy prophets who have been ever since the world began, having your garments spotless even as their garments are spotless, in the kingdom of heaven to go no more out.” (Alma 7:25) Thank God that power is on the earth.

Of Organized Religion and Living Apostles of Christ

Sign me up for organized religion, if God is the organizer. I have little interest in being part of the religions of men or observing the commandments of men, and I understand why others are put off by manmade religions. Equally, I find it hard to see why someone would not want to be part of a church that is run and organized by the Savior Jesus Christ, the Author of all good, the Source of all knowledge, the fountain of all love. What is there not to like? All that can be desired, all that really matters, all that is really joyful, is there.

The Apostle Paul described Christ’s church—its organization and purpose— in a letter to the saints in Ephesus:

And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers; For the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ: Till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ: That we henceforth be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive . . . (Ephesians 4:11-14)

It is clear that Christ intended His church and all of its parts to continue until all of God’s children became like Christ. And it also seems clear that without this church and its various parts, the children of God would become vulnerable to the doctrines and teachings of men.

Fortunately, Christ’s church is on the earth again, with all of the component parts that made up His church anciently, built on the foundation of apostles and prophets, together with the other important offices, “Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone” (Ephesians 2:20).

This past weekend, as they do twice each year, the apostles and prophets of the Church of Jesus Christ gathered in conference and spoke to all the world. Their words were a combination of the timeless and the timely, just as they were anciently. Test them and try them. They can be found at this website:

http://www.lds.org/general-conference?lang=eng

While the messages are spoken for all, as you listen carefully you will invariably hear messages spoken directly to you. For me, one of those messages was delivered by the Apostle Dieter F. Uchtdorf. He spoke of the sin of pride, reprising the words delivered more than a decade ago by the Lord’s prophet at that time, Ezra Taft Benson. He described the difference between two ways in which we use the word "pride." First, there is what we call pride, which is really rejoicing in the accomplishments and achievements of others, the pride we feel in our children, in our spouse, in our fellows, a pride that unites us. That is far different from the pride denounced by God throughout the ages, the pride that separates us from our fellowmen, the pride of comparison and hostility that has, in the words of Ezra Taft Benson, enmity at its roots.

The cure is humility. But the apostle did not mean the self-demeaning attitude that some mistake for humility. In his inspired words, “Humility is not thinking less of ourselves; it is thinking less about ourselves.” Working with, and among, and together with others, reaching out beyond ourselves, this true humility is a great antidote to the pride that would separate us, because it is built upon charity, the pure love of Christ.

This was a simple but powerful message, as were the many others presented. Whether on family and marriage, faith, deliverance from addictions, financial security, the power of gratitude, or the worth of the individual, the cures for the problems of society were offered through words inspired from heaven.

I could have received or enjoyed little of this left to my own devices. It was made available in an eternal abundance through the religion organized by Christ and offered to all of God’s children. And for that I am grateful.

Of Living on Earth and Preparing for the Heavens

The Prophet Joseph Smith, writing from the dirty damp pit of a crude jail on the frontier lands of western Missouri, where he and other Church leaders had been imprisoned beyond the effective reach of Constitutional protections of freedom of religion, admonished the Latter-day Saints not to set their hearts too much on the things of the world. At that point in time they had left nearly all of their things of the world behind them. They were being driven at sword and gunpoint across the cold November plains, the Governor having declared that all Mormons were to be “exterminated.” They received kindness and shelter from the people of Illinois and soon built what for a time became the largest city in the state, a city they called Nauvoo, the Beautiful.

Yet the Prophet’s admonition continued to ring true, as it does today. Under divine inspiration Joseph Smith wrote that, “there are many called, but few are chosen” to have the close association with God that the Father desires for all of His children. “And why are they not chosen?” His answer is important for any who would seek to rise above the vicissitudes and decay of this world and find happiness here and eternal joy in the world to come. In short, they are not chosen to receive the blessing and powers of God, “Because their hearts are set so much upon the things of this world” that they fail to learn and understand that the things of God “are inseparably connected with the powers of heaven” and can only be exercised by those whose eyes are fixed on heaven (Doctrine and Covenants 121:34-36). In other words, it takes a focus on God and heaven to receive the things of God and heaven.

As one draws closer to God through the companionship of the Holy Spirit, the less important the things of this life and this world become. The brevity of mortality becomes ever clearer as does the recognition that the conditions of immortality that prevail after the resurrection are the more normal and real human condition. Mortal man lives some seven or eight decades, while immortality never ends. Where does it make sense to place our focus? College degrees, political advancement, business position, and public recognition shrink in comparison with eternal values of family, friends, kindness, and personal integrity. As a modern-day Apostle declared, the omniscient God is not going to be impressed by your Ph.D. Neither will the Ruler of the universe be awed by your title of CEO.

This is not to say that achievement and accomplishment in this world are not important. They are very important, but only from the perspective of what they mean for you with regard to your life in heaven. An ancient American missionary explained that mortal life “is given us to prepare for eternity”. It is our responsibility to “improve our time while in this life” (Alma 34:33). Education, political achievement, business accomplishments, and the many other ways that we can improve upon our time are important because of how they prepare us.

It is the why that makes them important, not the what. Why did we learn, why did we seek to work in politics, why did we devote so much effort for our business accomplishments? If the answer is, to achieve public recognition, gain the praise of our fellows, increase our personal comforts—even to be admired by others as a good person—all of those may seem fine while mortality lasts, but for us they die with us. Fortunately, the hollowness of those purposes is felt in this life as a warning to us.

On the other hand, if the purposes of our achievements in life are in line with the values of heaven, then the real achievements, of which the worldly indicators are at best imperfect measures, will be with us now and remain with us forever and be amplified in the eternities. If our education has enabled us to live more wisely and to lift up our fellowmen, if our political efforts have been intended to promote human freedom and to give recognition to the worth of the individual, if our business accomplishments have been intended to unlock the creativity and achievement of ourselves and our fellows (which as a side effect contribute to the welfare of all) then in short as we have lived with an eye single to the glory of God we will have developed characteristics and built relationships with family and friends that will serve us well in the eternities. Then and only then can we envision with faith the Lord saying to us at the door of the eternal worlds, “Well done, thou good and faithful servant: thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will make thee ruler over many things: enter thou into the joy of thy lord.” (Matthew 25:21)

Of What Government Knows and What It Will Do

The biggest cause of the lingering financial trouble and the 2008 financial panic has been bad government policy. The markets did not fail. The markets did just what government policies encouraged them to do, namely over-invest in housing while paying little attention to the risks. That created twin bubbles in house prices and in the ways that building houses and buying houses were financed.

When the bubbles burst, the government leadership panicked, and the markets followed their leadership. Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson predicted imminent disaster, and the Federal Reserve rather than playing an independent steadying and calming hand reinforced those predictions (although without the public “fire in the theater” shouting of the Treasury Secretary).

Perhaps the best that can be said about the federal financial leaders during the financial crisis is that they did the best that they knew how to do. The problem was, that they did not know what to do. Each new memoir or retrospective published by one of these financial leaders reveals that they were acting on insufficient knowledge, insufficient information, and most of all insufficient understanding of what was going on. In other words, none of them knew enough to know what to do, and none of them knows enough now.

No one can ever know enough. The economy is just too big; there is too much for anyone but God to know. In an economy as large and diverse as ours, with billions of economic decisions being made all in the same day, it is impossible for anyone to know enough at any one time—of all that is involved—to be able to make the right decisions to control the economy, even if there were someone wise enough to do it.

That problem is not solved by creating a committee to control the economy. While any one person who serves as decision maker will suffer from lack of knowledge and will wear blinders towards the parts of the economy he either does not understand or is not watching at the moment, a committee of people has its own major shortcomings. Not the least of these is the proclivity of any group to be captured by group think, by the members of the group reinforcing each other to form a consensus and not venturing to upset things by questioning or looking beyond the consensus.

That is usually what happens with economic and financial bubbles. A key idea, usually a wrong idea, captures the group imagination. So many people come to believe this idea—like the odd notion that housing prices rarely if ever decline—that they all act on it, building up artificial values that increasingly depart from reality. When there is no government involvement, these bubbles burst soon enough and are resolved pretty quickly. Government leadership can hasten the formation of group think when an idea is part of official policy, and government policies can help to keep it going. Then, because government officials are slow to admit their own mistakes, government policies slow down the quick and natural adjustments that the market provides when the bubbles burst.

Unfortunately for all of us, the new Dodd-Frank financial regulatory legislation increases the power of new government financial czars to try to control virtually any aspect of the financial system that they choose. That error is not diminished by requiring these financial czars to meet together in committee from time to time, in a new Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC).

This last week two of the financial czars testified before a commission created to discover what caused the recent financial trouble and to recommend what to do about it (seems that if people were serious about this commission it would have made sense to pass new legislation only after the commission finished its work). One of the commission’s members, John Thompson, asked this question: “Why should we believe that this Council (the FSOC) is going to be uniquely different and keep us out of trouble?” (Donna Borak, “FCIC Presses Bernanke, Bair: Will Dodd-Frank End Bailouts?”, American Banker, September 3, 2010) Good question, but it got a poor answer, basically the observation that government regulators have more authority now. That is akin to saying that I will improve my aim because now I have more ammunition and a bigger gun.

Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke admitted that even with all the new power given to the federal financial czars it will take political will to use it. “If there’s a lack of political will, there’s probably no solution that is sustainable.” Even were we to believe beyond all experience that any federal regulators or group of federal regulators could possibly know enough, where is the evidence that there would be the political will to break through the regulatory group think? Where would there have been the political will to bring the housing bonanza to a halt, or even to rein in the politically powerful housing giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (which at least the Federal Reserve was seeking to do, against strong opposition from Congress—the stronger political will opposed needed reform)?

You do not need political will, however, if discipline in the markets is not a political decision. Market solutions do not require any political action or the exercise of political will by some federal financial czar or council of czars. No one needs a federal agency to drive down the stock of a badly managed company. Enron was beaten up by the markets long before Congress got around to it. The financial firms that disregarded risks in the housing bubble were put out of business by the markets—except for the firms that the government decided to prop up.

Which highlights the danger we are now in: today, as a result of the Dodd-Frank Act we have a financial system dependent on the government. Every important financial decision has now become a political question for one or more regulators to chew on and manage. Ready or not, here they come.

Of Visions and Reason

At age 14, in the year 1820, a young boy, Joseph Smith was visited by God the Father and His Son, Jesus Christ. It is very reasonable that the Father and the Son appeared to this boy.

First of all, it is very reasonable that God, the Father of our spirits, is interested in communion with His children. It is natural and reasonable to want to communicate with those whom we love. Parents certainly are more eager than most to want to communicate with their children. It is unreasonable to assume that God the Father, the perfect parent and possessor of infinite love, has no desire to communicate with His children.

Certainly it cannot be claimed that God the Omnipotent lacks the ability to communicate with His children. The scriptures provide ample evidence that God communicated directly with His children throughout the thousands of years of antiquity. Is it reasonable to assume that God has somehow lost that ability and no longer has it in modern times? Remember that for those living in antiquity, those were modern times. God has always had and continues to have the ability to communicate with His children.

Nor can it be reasonably asserted that there is less need today than anciently for God’s children to receive the light, wisdom, and instruction that come with divine communication. As recorded in the scriptures God has spoken with His children about the need for honesty, kindness, diligent labor, peace within the society and proper relations among societies. He counseled on respect for life, the worth of the individual, fairness in financial dealings, marriage and childrearing, care for the poor and needy, and healthy foods and hygiene. Which of these issues are unimportant to modern man? Which are free of controversy today? It is reasonable that man today could benefit from Divine guidance on each and all of these issues, and on many new ones besides.

As happens among human families, perhaps some estrangement has occurred in God’s family, between the Father and His children. There is some truth in that. Again, the scriptures provide numerous examples of the estrangement between God and man, as men have rejected God and turned to idols and other alien loves. The Egyptian captivity of Israel and the Babylonian captivity of Judah are two prominent examples. What the scriptures also demonstrate is that, not unlike human parents, God has been persistent in His efforts to overcome that estrangement, to bring His children back into His presence. That was the mission of many of the prophets. Indeed, foremost of all, the sacrifice of Jesus Christ is all about the infinite effort by the Father, through his Firstborn Son, to bring His children back into His presence. Being brought back into that presence has always been accompanied by an increase in direct communication between God and man. It is reasonable that God is as persistent in His efforts with modern man as He was with ancient Israel to overcome the estrangement of man from God and strengthen divine communication.

A major consequence of the estrangement of man from the Father is the enormous confusion that prevails today among the children of God about the nature of their Father. Indeed, the simple knowledge so commonly held anciently that God is the actual Father of our spirits and that we are His children and heirs has been replaced by any number of man-made ideas and speculations. It is reasonable that the Father would want His children to know who and what He is, particularly since it is so important to their understanding of who and what they are. God could tell His children, as He has and does, but it is very reasonable that He would want to show them, as He also has done before. What more effective and reasonable way to break through the web of confusion about the nature of God that prevails in the world today?

It is extremely reasonable and sensible that the Father would choose a young boy to be the recipient of this great vision of the Father and the Son. Joseph Smith was old enough to understand, at the age when young boys’ queries of the Divine and the nature of the universe and themselves can become acute. At that age and with his limited exposure to the world and its ways, he was free of crippling vices and possessed a mind largely free of preconceived notions and indoctrination in human theories. The young boy Joseph was a clean vessel into which the Lord could pour divine knowledge with little fear of it being clouded with evil dispositions or mixed with false notions. The fourteen year old boy Joseph Smith was a very reasonable choice for God to reveal the pure and bright truth of His nature.

Why then and there? It is often difficult for modern man to appreciate that he is living in historic times, when great and historic things happen. It is when someone’s “modern times” become history to a new age of moderns that the mind can give more room to acknowledge a great event. That is why some are more willing to accept that God appeared to the ancients than they are the idea that He might do so today. But it did happen, and the time was right for it.

The religious freedom that prevailed in the United States in the early nineteenth century—which is still so foreign to so much of the world today—was a relatively new and fragile achievement in 1820. There was just enough of it enshrined in the Constitution and generally accepted by the people that God the Father could make a new attempt to restore direct and open communication between God and man without governments or mobs seeking to destroy it and its challenge to their ways of thinking and doing things. As it was, it was touch and go. Those who accepted new direct revelation from the Father were driven by mobs and local governments from town to town and state to state.

But it did survive, and since 1820 the estrangement between God and man that restrained communication between the Father and His children has been receding all across the globe. It had to begin with someone. God had to talk to someone first. For these and many other reasons, God the Father, and His Son, Jesus Christ, appeared to the young boy, Joseph Smith, and God has continued to increase His communication with His children ever since. Today the Father is in direct communication with millions of His children across the world, and more every day. It is very reasonable that He do so.

Of Faith and Works

I wish to share a recent conversation on the subject of faith and works. Some very theoretical theologians seek an artificial—and non-biblical—separation between the two. The presumed differences erected between faith and works by these arguments are seemingly philosophical and semantic, but they lead to very different practices that can mean great differences in real life. I repeat the conversation below, simplified into its chief elements. I will refer to my partner in the conversation as Sam.

Sam: Christianity is divided into faith-based churches and works-based churches.

WAA: I reject that division. I think that it’s artificial, man-made, not God-made. But so that I might understand you better, explain to me what you mean by it.

Sam: Really, there is a difference. There are those who believe that they have to do works to be saved, that by their works they earn salvation and that they need those good works to be saved. We believe that no amount of works can be sufficient to earn salvation, that Christ provides salvation through His grace, and that we receive that grace through faith in Christ, faith alone. Indeed, we think it presumptive of anyone to think that he can somehow earn his way to Christ’s grace. If you could earn it, it wouldn’t be grace—and in any event you would always come up short.

WAA: I would suggest then, that either there is no difference between what you and I believe on this matter, or you yourself do not believe in what you are saying.

Sam: How do mean?

WAA: Just this. You say in effect that we cannot earn Christ’s grace, that if we do, it would not be grace, that believing is the essential thing and that it is enough.

Sam: That is correct.

WAA: What does belief involve? Can I believe and still swindle my neighbor?

Sam: No, if you are swindling your neighbor, then you probably don’t really believe.

WAA: So it seems that you agree with James, the brother of Jesus, that there is a connection between faith and works. He was the one who taught that our faith is shown by our works.

Sam: But it is the faith that saves, not the works.

WAA: I would agree with that, taking faith in its wholeness. For it is clear that the two are connected, that faith and works are not irrelevant to each other. As James says, without the works there is no faith. Faith without works is dead (James 2:20, 26). But I will go even so far as to say that any good works are good, because they are a demonstration of faith, a demonstration of what you believe. I think that you believe that, too. You act like you do.

Sam: How do you mean?

WAA: You go to church regularly?

Sam: Yes.

WAA: You obey laws, you are kind to your neighbors, you are loyal to your wife and family. All of that is true?

Sam: Yes, all true. But I make plenty of mistakes and have my share of unkind thoughts in the course of the day.

WAA: I think that you are making my point. Why do you do the good that you do—acknowledging that you are otherwise prone to live not so good if you just let yourself go—why do you overcome those unkind thoughts and act kindly?

Sam: Because it would be wrong to be unkind.

WAA: Why? Measured by what? Measured by Christ’s commandments, especially Christ’s two great commandments, to love God and to love your neighbor.

Sam: I can’t argue with that. But by my faith in Christ I am saved, no matter how many good works I do.

WAA: Is that so? Do you really believe that? Do you think that you would be saved if you were cruel to your wife and unkind to your children, swindled your neighbor, cheated your employer? If you stopped going to church, neglected your duties?

Sam: As I said, that would show a lack of faith.

WAA: Exactly. We are saved by our faith because our faith is part of our works. You cannot have faith without it revealing itself. You cannot hide your faith. Faith shows itself in good works. God has spent a lot of time and effort giving us commandments to show us the path of goodness. You have to disregard a large part of the Bible if you assume that commandments and keeping them is not important. It seems important to God. Your good actions—measured by their consistency with God’s commandments—demonstrate your faith in the giver of those commandments.

Sam: But it is never enough. We cannot do enough to merit salvation. The apostle John taught that whoever claims to be without sin is deceiving himself (1 John 1:8).

WAA: That is true. That is precisely why we need a Savior. Christ knows that we would never do enough. But that is no reason to stop trying. There are many things that I have not mastered but that I keep trying to master. For a righteous person driven by faith, falling short is incentive to get up and try harder, having faith that Christ will help you to do better, that with His help you can do better. The Master of all takes our very best efforts, however imperfect, and makes them perfect. He makes up the difference, in fact draws us on and helps us to narrow the difference. And He makes our efforts worthwhile with faith that the Savior will add the necessary finishing touches.

Sam: But only for those who believe in Him.

WAA: Again, we agree. Because we believe in Him, we try to be like Him, we do what He asks. Through our works we show Him—and perhaps show to ourselves—our faith. Or, as John taught, through our works of obedience we reveal that we love God and make that love real (1 John 2:3-6; 5:3). It is to those who have faith in Him, who love Him, in real life and living practice, that He extends His grace and salvation. We may not earn salvation, but in this way we qualify for it by meeting the conditions set by the Savior. The ancient American prophet, Nephi, explained it this way: “reconcile yourselves to the will of God, and not to the will of the devil and the flesh; and remember, after ye are reconciled unto God, that it is only in and through the grace of God that ye are saved.” (2 Ne. 10:24)

Sam: I still think that we disagree.

WAA: It is only if you try to separate faith and works that we will disagree. James described it in a powerful metaphor. He said that as the spirit and body united give life to the body and when separated the body is dead, so faith and works, when separated, become dead also (James 2:14-20, 26). So, we are saved by faith if you mean the faith that produces the works of complying with God’s commandments. If you do not, then your faith is dead and cannot save you because it does not help you to become better. What good is that kind of faith? It is of no value at all. It is the faith of the devils, as James explained (James 2:19), who have known the Savior from before the beginning of time. But God is the God of life and the living, and if your faith is alive it will lead you to the Source of all life, even to God the Father. As Jesus taught, “if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.” (Matt. 19:17)

The conversation continues, but I will leave it there, for now.