One of the most moving scenes in the entire Harry Potter
series of books by J.K. Rowling is the death of beloved headmaster, Albus
Dumbledore.
A standard element of much
good fiction writing is the presence of a character representing a deliverer,
sometimes referred to by scholars of fiction as being a “Christ figure.”
Such a character in the novel serves as a
touchstone of good, who is rarely the main character but is a steady and
constant central person to guide and often deliver the main character from
danger and evil.
Gandalf serves that
role in the
Lord of the Rings trilogy
of J.R.R. Tolkien.
Albus Dumbledore
fulfills that role for Harry Potter and his friends.
In the scene to which I refer, Dumbledore is on a balcony of
a high tower, cornered, disarmed, and surrounded by merciless enemies impatient
for his murder. I quote just a few lines
for my purpose:
“Good
evening, Amycus,” said Dumbledore calmly, as though welcoming the man to a tea
party. “And you’ve brought Alecto too. .
. . Charming. . .”
The
woman gave an angry little titter.
“Think your little jokes’ll help you on your deathbed then?” she jeered.
“Jokes? No, no, these are manners,” replied
Dumbledore.
(J.K.
Rowling, Harry Potter and the Half-Blood
Prince, p.593)
Manners. Perhaps they seem extravagant for a man
facing sure death, but why not, why not retain high humanity in the last
moments of mortality? Outside of novels
and in the real life where we live, what I find distressing is the absence of manners in places where they should
be found.
A prominent example is the recent debate between the 2012
candidates for vice president of the United States, the second highest
executive office in the land. This is a
lofty and important office, one of only two to which a man or woman ascends by the vote and permission of the entire nation. Many vice presidents have gone on to become
president. A debate among these
candidates is an important opportunity to help voters discern who would make
the better government leader, deserving of their support.
Respect for the electorate as well as each other would seem
to call for courtesy and a display of good manners. And yet the current, sitting vice president
displayed very poor manners, frequently interrupting his opponent and openly
laughing at serious arguments about serious subjects. The assertion and presentation of views in
public debate can be sharp and indeed critical of the views of the other, but
courtesy to the electorate would allow them to hear each argument made fully
and without interruption, and respect for the views of one another would create
an atmosphere that fosters a thoughtful consideration of the issues. Such manners were largely absent in the
public conduct of the current vice president of the United States in this nationally
televised debate. I might add that the
debate moderator, who should have encouraged better conduct, herself showed poor
conduct, frequently interrupting each of the candidates to insert herself as a third
participant in the debate.
Society exists only by respect that people have for one
another. We extend our courtesies that
allow all of us with our own personalities and interests and characters to live
in close proximity to one another and even to be ready to cooperate from time
to time. It tears the social fabric to undermine that civility.
About a year ago I visited Tokyo, one of the most densely populated
places on the globe. I was astonished at
how relatively quiet the city was. I do
not think I ever heard a car horn sounded, though I witnessed driving practices
that would have quickly provoked anxious beeping in the United States. I asked my hosts about that. All of the cars were equipped with horns, but
I was informed that it would be considered discourteous in Japan to sound
them other than for emergency purposes.
I am sure that Japanese drivers get on each other’s nerves as frequently
as American drivers do, but the incidence of driver’s rage is significantly
reduced by observance of this courtesy.
And then there was my recent visit to Johannesburg, South Africa. There is a lot of hope that South Africa
can play a major leadership role in the economic and social development of much
of the rest of the continent, the poorest of all the seven continents. The nation has a good head start on its
neighbors, with a functioning representative government with free and
competitive elections, laws supported by an independent judiciary, a
diversifying economy, including much local industry, and a strong banking
system.
What surprised and depressed me was what I saw of South
African homes. Traveling throughout the
city I did not see a single family home that was not enclosed in a concrete or
fenced stockade, topped in barbwire, concertina wire, or even electrically-charged
wiring. During the day people seemed
pleasant enough, but come nighttime, families retreated into their fortified
compounds, however small. Every nation
has crime, but not every nation lacks the minimum of civility needed to allow
people to sleep at night without dread of violent assault on their property and
person.
I do not doubt that we can find similar zones in parts of
American cities, but I have never seen anything so pervasive as what I observed
in Johannesburg. I am told that it was not racially based,
given the history of difficult race relations in South Africa, but rather
economically based. Not only was there
little respect for property among many in the population, but too little
respect for each other. I hope and trust
that things are getting better there or will get better.
I fear what the erosion of respect for property and person
might produce in the United
States.
Kind words and practices of courtesy reinforce through our conduct our
recognition of each other’s humanity.
What we witnessed in the vice presidential debate was a courser, callous
style of human interaction. We encounter
similar scenes too often. I pray that in
places where respect and courtesy are lacking I have not seen the future for
our society, or for the erosion of our society.
It is not a happy way to live.