The most that they can possibly prove or know is that they personally
have not found God yet and that this lack of discovery has caused them
seriously to doubt. Unless they can be
everywhere at all times and understand all things (which would be nigh unto
godhood itself) they cannot say with intellectual honesty that God does not
exist. They cannot get further down the
road of atheism beyond the signpost of agnosticism. I
understand the challenge of proving a negative, and affirming a negative is
even bolder, but atheists themselves claim to have met this challenge, a claim
that they have never substantiated.
Agnosticism is another thing, if engaged in honestly. Honestly, it is an admission—or even
affirmation—that one does not know. The
agnostic can explain why he does not know, what avenues he has unsuccessfully
explored to know. What he cannot
honestly do is claim to know all that can be known or what others know. The agnostic strays into the same errors of
the atheist if he claims that because he does not know God then no one else
can. How could he possibly know that? How can his experience circumscribe the
experience of others, including the experience of those he has never met? He can espouse theories as to why he
disbelieves the claims of knowledge of others and even why he believes that
others could not know, or even why he has lost hope that others know, but he cannot prove his theory, again unless he can be
everywhere and know all things. The
agnostic cannot honestly pretend to knowledge that he does not have about the
knowledge or experience of others. Not
all agnostics do.
Agnostics do have a point viewing the global and historical
variety of manmade religions, which present a deep well of disappointment to
those seeking evidence of the Divine. When
Jesus Christ spoke directly in person to the young boy Joseph Smith in 1820 the
Savior ratified to Joseph much of the factual assertions of the honest
agnostic. The Savior declared to Joseph
that all the religions then on the earth were creations of men, not of God,
that “they teach for doctrines the commandments of men” having little more than
“a form of godliness, but they deny the power thereof” (Joseph Smith-History,
verse 19). Many of the religions of 1820
exist today, while inventive men have been working diligently since to create
many more.
There was much justification for the agnostic in 1820. There is increasingly less today. The fact that all of the religions 190 years
ago were manmade does not mean that God Himself could not establish—or
reestablish—His own church and religion on the earth. In fact, 2,500 years ago God promised that He
would do just that. When the prophet
Daniel interpreted the dream of the Babylonian King Nebuchadnezzar, he
prophesied that in the last days God Himself would establish on earth His
religion, symbolized in the dream as a stone “cut out of the mountain without
hands” that would roll forward until it filled the whole earth (Daniel 2:28-45). Daniel then prophetically declared to the
king, “the dream is certain, and the interpretation thereof sure.” (Daniel
2:45)
Which means that to honest atheist and agnostic alike, the
message is beware lest you stop looking too soon, for the good news is that aside
from the religions of men God has done His own work and revealed Himself to His
children, as He promised long ago. These
things can be known today, certain and sure.
No comments:
Post a Comment